National Center for Supercomputing Applications at Urbana-Champaign

Silverlight VAST - Bringing Light to Your Data


VAST 2008 Challenge
Mini Challenge 4:  Evacuation Traces

Authors and Affiliations:

Lorne Leonard, National Center for Supercomputing Applications at Urbana-Champaign, leonard@ncsa.uiuc.edu [PRIMARY contact]

Loretta Auvil, National Center for Supercomputing Applications at Urbana-Champaign, lauvil@ncsa.uiuc.edu

Student team: NO

Tool(s):

A web application (Figure 1) developed by Lorne Leonard using Silverlight was developed for the sole purpose to answer this mini challenge. The application allows users to scroll through the sequence of events, show paths of selected tags and filter tags by distance travelled. Metrics were calculated for distance travelled and percent of non-movement.

BuildingScreenshot.jpg

Figure 1: Building Evacuation Web Application developed with Silverlight.

 

Two Page Summary:   NO

 

ANSWERS:


Traces-1 Where was the device set off?

 Grid cell number of where the device went off:

66x31 (0, 0 Top Left)

Short Answer:

At approximately tick 380 an explosion went off at the location marked with an E and shaded in orange (Cell 66x31) as indicated in Figure 2.

 

We determined this location by the following factors:

·         The majority of people in this area stopped moving and did not leave the area.

·         The direction people moved after tick 380 (light blue arrows). The vectors do not cross and move away from this area.

 

The one exception is the area marked with a C and shaded in yellow. At approximately tick 587, people stopped moving thru this corridor and exit area. We speculate the cause as toxic gases from the first explosion due to the erratic movement of tags 60, 65,69,47,78 and the fact that tag 39 kept moving toward this area. 

Figure 2: E and shaded area in orange denotes location of explosion.


 

Traces-2  Identify potential suspects and/or witnesses to the event.
Note: Potential suspects and/or witnesses are people who were near the area just prior to the explosion and exhibit suspicious behavior 

List of RFID tag numbers :

    1; 18; 21; 28; 29; 36; 38; 44; 80;   

Short Answer:

The above RFID tags correspond to people who were within the area of the explosion and/or moved towards the corridor to inspect what happened and then continued to leave the building.

 

RFID tag 80 Joshua Sanchez office was adjacent to the area of the explosion and exhibited no behavior of curiosity to what happen next to him. However, he immediately left the building at the closest exit.   

 

Our prime suspect is RFID 21 as Ramon Katalanow moved into the room of the explosion and left promptly to another corridor away from the explosion. Then Katalanow re-enters the same corridor as the explosion before leaving the building.

Tags Gale Welsh (18) and Franisco Salter (36) did not move during the entire period and tag 18 was in the room of the explosion. Since the lack of movement (99% of the entire period) and the distanced travelled is about one unit, these two should be considered prime suspects.

Tags 29 and 44 are suspects as they walked quite far to be in area to the bottom right before the explosion. An advantage as these two suspects only had to move a short distance to escape the building. Further investigation is needed to determine why they were so close to this exit.


 

Traces-3  Identify any suspects and/or witnesses who managed to escape the building.

List of RFID tag numbers :

    1; 18; 21; 28; 36; 38; 80;

Short Answer:

The fact that Gale Welsh (18) and Franisco Salter (36) travelled only 1 unit for the entire period makes them prime suspects that need investigation further.  Are the two suspects RFID tags broken? Did the suspects leave the tags on a desk purposely? Did they die before the incident happen? The main witnesses include tags 1, 21, 28, 38, 80 who were near the explosion and escaped the building.


Traces-4  Identify any casualties.

 List of RFID tag numbers :

    18;19;36;39;47;50;56;59;60;65;69;76;78;

 Short Answer:

The above RFID tags showed no movement from ticks 692 to 837. Tags 18 and 36 showed no movement for the entire period and may have been killed before the explosion.

 


Traces-5  Describe the evacuation

 Detailed Answer:

At approximately tick 380 an explosion went off at the location marked in orange and the letter E (Cell 66x31) as indicated in Figure 2. The majority of people evacuated to the southwest corner of the building, marked as EV1 in Figure 3. At the time of the explosion, these people were working in the yellow area marked with an E in Figure 2. EV3 (light blue area) denotes the location of the explosion where the majority of casualties occurred instantly, but also is the exit where one of the prime suspects RFID 21 Ramon Katalanow left the building. People within the EV4 area had the shortest distance to escape the building. However, RFID tags 29 Maxwell Lopez and 44 Karissa Graham walked quite far to reach this area just before the time of the explosion. These two people should be included as suspects. The remaining area EV2 also had casualties determined by the lack of movement after tick 675. The possible causes of these deaths include a secondary explosion, or toxic gases from the explosion at tick 380. A yellow circle with letter C denotes the location of these casualties in Figure 2.

BuildingFigure2.jpg

Figure 3: Denoting main locations where people escaped.